George Washington – Said No to Sodomites in Military

George Washington – Said No to Sodomites in Military 5.00/5 (100.00%) 1 vote

In the last 50 years our world has changed so much, faster than anytime in the written and oral history of mankind.  In these 50 years, our morals and understanding of moral deprivation and evil has taken a dramatic nose dive into open & shameful debauchery. Our forefathers, the Founders of America would not only be disgusted by our behavior, they wouldn’t believe what has become of the nation they and their brothers fought and died for.

In June of this year 2012, the Pentagon hosted the first ever govt. sponsored gay pride event.  Let’s take a look to see what our first President General George Washington had to say about gays in the military.

Head Quarters, V. Forge, Saturday, March 14, 1778.

At a General Court Martial whereof Colo. Tupper was President (10th March 1778) Lieutt. Enslin of Colo. Malcom’s Regiment tried for attempting to commit sodomy, with John Monhort a soldier; Secondly, For Perjury in swearing to false Accounts, found guilty of the charges exhibited against him, being breaches of 5th. Article 18th. Section of the Articles of War and do sentence him to be dismiss’d the service with Infamy. His Excellency the Commander in Chief approves the sentence and with Abhorrence and Detestation of such Infamous Crimes orders Lieutt. Enslin to be drummed out of Camp tomorrow morning by all the Drummers and Fifers in the

[Note 28: Lieut. Frederick Gotthold Enslin.] Army never to return; The Drummers and Fifers to attend on the Grand Parade at Guard mounting for that Purpose.  (Library of Congress)

In my search I found that many of the founders and those who were inspirations to our founding fathers viewed homosexuality as not only a threat to society, but they knew that homosexuality is the last step a country or nation takes before it’s downfall. Here are a few more quotes:

Sir William Blackstone, whose authored extensive Commentaries on the Laws of England from 1765-1769 became the preeminent legal authority that was admired and used by America’s Founding Fathers, stated:

IV. WHAT has been here observed…, which ought to be the more clear in proportion as the crime is the more detestable, may be applied to another offence, of a still deeper malignity; the infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast…. But it is an offence of so dark a nature…that the accusation should be clearly made out….

I WILL not act so disagreeable part, to my readers as well as myself, as to dwell any longer upon a subject, the very mention of which is a disgrace to human nature. It will be more eligible to imitate in this respect the delicacy of our English law, which treats it, in it’s very indictments, as a crime not fit to be named…This the voice of nature and of reason, and the express law of God, determine to be capital. Of which we have a signal instance, long before the Jewish dispensation, by the destruction of two cities by fire from heaven: so that this is a universal, not merely a provincial, precept.

The first law-book of the America, authored by founding jurist Zephaniah Swift, referring to sodomy, stated,
This crime, tho repugnant to every sentiment of decency and delicacy, is very prevalent in corrupt and debauched countries where the low pleasures of sensuality and luxury have depraved the mind and degraded the appetite below the brutal creation. Our modest ancestors, it seems by the diction of the law, had no idea that a man would commit this crime. . . . Here, by force of common law, [it is] punished with death. . . . [because of] the disgust and horror with which we treat of this abominable crime.

Sodomy was a criminal offense at common law and was forbidden by the laws of the original 13 States when they ratified the Bill of Rights. In 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, all but 5 of the 37 States in the Union had criminal sodomy laws. Until 1961, all 50 States outlawed sodomy, with about half in 2003 continuing to provide criminal penalties for sodomy performed in private and between consenting adults.

Miller reports that the penalty for homosexuality in several states was death — including New York, Vermont, Connecticut, and South Carolina. Thomas Jefferson advocated “dismemberment” (castration) as the penalty for homosexuality in his home state of Virginia, and even authored a bill to that effect, reducing the penalty from death.

[divider top=”0″]

Dear Readers – the choice for how this all plays out lies in your heart, your soul, and your mind.  Please do not stand by idly while our country is destroyed from within.  While our govt has been trying to ramp up security to stop terrorists from blowing us up, they and WE have allowed moral terrorists to tear down our constitution, our values, and our standards and we have allowed them to replace those great things, with political correctness, homosexuality, and debauchery all in the name of ‘equality and civil rights’ with the 4 letter word attached at the end… LOVE.



Michael Bowes discerned a vocation with a religious community for 1.5 yrs before discerning that he was not called to that particular order. After leaving the Monastic life, Michael returned to Northern Virginia where he attends St. John the Evangelist Catholic Church in Warrenton, Va. Michael is an aspiring writer and volunteers at his local hospital as a Chaplain.

4 thoughts on “George Washington – Said No to Sodomites in Military

  1. windowinthesky88

    I really liked your post, but I have to say I was a little offended that you say that real men that protect our country our just marines, yes the video of the Navy is degrading towards what they should focus on, but I should mention the Navy one is the Naval Academy and that is a 'spirit' video. My future husband is in the Navy and he does not act in such a manner so I feel you should not group it in such a way.

    Please keep writing and God bless.

    1. Michael Post author

      Hi Window,

      Your right, I updated the post and removed the offensive 'grouping'. I guess I am biased in a certain manner towards the Marines, as my brother is one. There are plenty of good men in all the armed forced, not just the marines. My uncle was a navy seal.

      Anyways, thanks for the comment.

      God Bless,


  2. WorldBeyond

    The soldiers in those videos just look like they're having fun; I don't see anything disturbing about it. These guys are doing their best to protect our country, and this seems like a harmless way to blow off the steam that comes with the job. I also find it offensive that you would propose that homosexuality degrades the military. Forcing military members to hide their sexual orientations only hinders those members from giving their all to the military. Instead of being able to focus on their jobs, they are instead distracted by what will happen if their orientations become disclosed. Citing historical figures like George Washington doesn't add to your argument either: those same people owned slaves and limited women's rights. I celebrate my founding fathers for what they achieved, but I don't idolize them or anyone else as perfect humans.

    1. Michael Post author

      Hi WorldBeyond,

      I don't know any of my 'guy' friends that would find this amusing, funny, or 'fun'. What I see is a group of men that are charged with the security of MY freedom and the countries, acting like a bunch of effeminate women and dancing in a provocative and non-manly way. If you want to have 'Spirit Week' like the naval guys had.. that is fine.. as long as you act in your own gender and behave like the man you are called to be. Immorality is a sign of weakness. Weakness leads to a weak minded and inferior person who has a lack of moral temperance. The Army guys are just completely off the radar. If I was defending my country from an attacker and I saw my enemies acting in such a homo-erotic manner in a video.. not only would my respect for the men go down, but I would view them and the country they represent as pansies who not only need to be destroyed, but conquered.

      General Conway recently gave an exclusive interview to Fox News in which he again stated allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the military would cause problems for our armed forces.

      “When we take a survey of our Marines, by and large, they say that they are concerned that it will cause potential problems with regard to their order and discipline — that it will impact their sense of unit cohesion,” Conway said.

      Right now, there are 20,000 Marines serving in Afghanistan. Conway told Fox he “wouldn’t hazard a guess” as to how many are gay, but he think it’s a small percentage, in the “low single digits.”

      Conway says these few gays don’t cause a problem now because their homosexuality is not known publicly. But he said if their sexuality does become public, “90 to 95 percent of the Marines” he has informally surveyed are concerned about the consequences. Conway cited impromptu surveys he has conducted by a “show of hands” among Marines at town hall style meetings. —

      For thousands of years, soldiers have always been recognized to be the toughest men that their country or province could produce and those men represented their people with their vitality and strength. Now we have a bunch of whiny effeminate freaks who are dancing to 'Lady Gaga'? Are you kidding me? You don't see a problem with that? They should have instead formed a theme to the song from 'The Patriot' or some other great american hero movie or song and represented a video of what our soldiers are really supposed to stand for.

      Lastly.. but certainly not least. Your judgement on George Washington is false. See:

      Limited women's rights? Seriously?

      Until next time.



Leave a Reply


Get the latest posts delivered to your mailbox: